null


home

Modified-release Dipyridamole Combined with Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients suffering from transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke have a high risk of suffering a first or recurrent stroke, with an annual risk of between 5 and 15%. In the ESPS 2 Study the 2-year relative risk reduction of stroke in the aspirin plus MR-dipyridamole group (37.0%) was significantly higher than in either the aspirin group (18.1%) or the MR-dipyridamole group (16.3%). The results of ESPS 2 were at odds with all prior trials with dipyridamole alone or in association with aspirin, but it was also the only trial sufficiently powered to show a significant difference.

ESPS 2 Study

References:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

ESPS 2 Group. J Neurol Sci 1997; 151 (Suppl): S1-S77.


For this reason, a meta-analysis was performed based on a systematic review of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials involving dipyridamole in patients with prior ischaemic stroke or TIA. Recurrent stroke was reduced by dipyridamole compared with placebo, and by combined aspirin and dipyridamole versus aspirin alone, dipyridamole alone or placebo.

Metaanalysis

References:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.
Leonardi-Bee et al. Stroke 2005; 36 (1): 162-168.


In two post hoc analyses the efficacy of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole was compared with aspirin alone for the prevention of recurrent stroke among high-risk groups. Stroke models from the Framingham Study and the Stroke Prognostic Instrument II were applied to subjects in ESPS 2 to assign patients to risk groups. Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin plus MR-dipyridamole demonstrated a more pronounced efficacy in reducing the risk for stroke and vascular events among patients younger than 70 years of age, with hypertension, or prior stroke; current smokers; and those with any prior cardiovascular disease.

ESPS 2 Study

References:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.
Sacco et al. Arch Neurol 2005; 62 (3): 403-408.

ESSEN RISK SCORE

In another post hoc analysis the authors applied a risk score developed from the clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE) trial. The category "other cardiovascular" included ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure and ventricular arrhythmia.

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

Essen Risk Score Based on a Subgroup Analysis of Stroke Patients in the CAPRIE Trial

Risk factor Points
< 65 years 0
65-75 years 1
> 75 years 2
Hypertension 1
Diabetes 1
Previous MI 1
Other cardiovascular disease (except MI and atrial fibrillation) 1
Peripheral arterial disease 1
Smoker 1
Additional TIA or ischaemic stroke in addition to qualifying event 1
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events;
MI: Myocardial infarction; TIA: Transient ischaemic attack.

A total score of 3 or more reflects a high recurrence risk for stroke (= 4%/year).

Patients with a low risk score of 0-2 show no difference between aspirin and MR-dipyridamole aspirin. Patients with a high risk of recurrent stroke had a much greater benefit from aspirin plus MR-dipyridamole compared with aspirin monotherapy than patients with a low risk. This result shows that stratification of patients according to risk of recurrent stroke will lead to different treatment regimens.

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

Annual Event Rates (%) from the ESPS 2 Trial Based on the Essen Risk Score

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

PROFESS® TRIAL

The need for a direct comparison of the MR-dipyridamole aspirin combination with clopidogrel is being addressed in the PRoFESS® trial, which is currently underway. PRoFESS® is comparing MR- dipyridamole aspirin with clopidogrel.
Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

PRoFESS® Trial Study Design

Agent Plus n
MR-dipyridamole
-aspirin*
Clopidogrel placebo and telmisartan § 4625
Clopidogrel placebo and telmisartan placebo 4625
Clopidogrel‡ MR-dipyridamole-aspirin placebo and telmisartan § 4625
MR-dipyridamole-aspirin placebo and telmisartan placebo 4625
* MR-dipyridamole-aspirin: 200 mg/25 mg twice daily.
‡ Clopidogrel: 75 mg once daily.
§ Telmisartan: 80 mg once daily.
MR: Modified release; PRoFESS®: Prevention Regime For Effectively avoiding Second Strokes.

PRoFESS® Study

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

BLEEDINGS

All-site bleeding episodes and gastrointestinal bleeds were significantly more frequent and more often moderate or severe/fatal in patients receiving aspirin compared with those receiving aspirin alone. Similarly, there was no significant difference between rates of severe or fatal bleeding in the MR-dipyridamole-aspirin group compared with the aspirin monotherapy group.

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

Incidences of Severe or Fatal Bleeding of Patients with Prior Stroke or TIA in the ESPS 2 Trial

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

Executive Summary

EFFICACY

The European Stroke Prevention Study ESPS 2, the only trial to use the current modified-release (MR) dipyridamole-aspirin formulation, found the combination to be superior to either drug alone in preventing strokes in people with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The combination reduced stroke risk by 37% compared with placebo (p = 0.001) over 2 years.

Post hoc analysis of cardiac events in those patients with coronary heart disease or myocardial infarction at entry to ESPS 2 showed that dipyridamole is not effective in preventing cardiac events but neither is it harmful in such patients.

TOLERABILITY & SAFETY

In the ESPS 2 trial, bleeding episodes were not significantly more frequent with combination therapy than with aspirin alone.

Headaches were the most frequent reason for discontinuation in patients taking dipyridamole in ESPS 2. Their incidence and severity decreases rapidly within the first few days if patients persist with treatment.

COMPARISON WITH OTHER ANTITHROMBOTIC OPTIONS

MR-dipyridamole-aspirin and clopidogrel are being directly compared in the ongoing Prevention Regime For Effectively avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS®) trial.

TREATMENT GUIDELINES & EVIDENCE-BASED PRESCRIBING

Based on current evidence, most guidelines include MR-dipyridamole-aspirin as a first-line option for secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or TIA, and some recent versions suggest it may be preferable to the other options.

Reference:
Diener HC. Aging Health 2005; 1 (1): 19-26.

Up
© 2005 Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Germany. All rights reserved.
Search
Site Map
Contact